|

The History of LIHEAP [see
this URL for a chronology of LIHEAP]
The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program was authorized by
Title XXVI of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 and
began in 1982. Its purpose is "to assist low-income households,
particularly those with the lowest income, that pay a high proportion
of household income for home energy, primarily in meeting their
immediate home energy needs." LIHEAP was designed to provide
help to low-income households with a minimum of government bureaucracy
and a maximum of involvement by civic institutions. LIHEAP evolved
from earlier programs created in response to the energy crisis of
the 1970s. The most notable of these was the Emergency Energy Assistance
Program, established when Congress provided funds in 1977 to turn
a pilot program into one that was national in scope.
Federal dollars for LIHEAP are allocated by the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services to the states as a block grant and
are disbursed under programs designed by the individual states.
Program funds are distributed by a formula, which is weighted towards
relative cold-weather conditions and households living in poverty.
The program is administered at the state and county levels by governmental
agencies and implemented primarily at the local level by community
action programs (CAPS), local welfare agencies and area agencies
on aging. LIHEAP funds are supplemented to a limited extent by additional
state appropriations, programs from energy suppliers and utilities,
church donations and local charitable "fuel funds" administered
by the Salvation Army, Catholic Charities and other organizations.
The Need for LIHEAP
LIHEAP remains dependent on federal appropriations process for its
funding, which means that the amount granted to the program varies
from year to year. Federal funds for LIHEAP have fluctuated from
a high of $2.1 billion in FY 1985 to a low of $1.0 billion in FY
1997. In FY 2006, Congress appropriated $2 billion for LIHEAP, however
President Bush approved an additional $1 billion ($500 million in
regular program funds and $500 million as emergency contingency
funds), bringing the total funding up to $3 billion. In June of
2006, the House Appropriations Committee voted to cut LIHEAP funding
by one third, returning LIHEAP's funding to the $2 billion level.
It remains to be seen whether the Senate will accept the proposed
cuts.
Source: LIHEAP Report to Congress for FY 2000, Table
2
Even with the relatively high funding level for FY
2006, LIHEAP program directors face an ongoing crisis. According
to the US Department of Health and Human Services, between 1981
and FY 2000, the number of federally eligible households rose over
49 percent; however, federal fuel assistance funds rose only 22
percent. As a consequence, the percentage of federally eligible
households receiving LIHEAP assistance has declined sharply, from
36 percent in 1981 to 20 percent in FY 2000.[1]
The funds allotted to states cannot meet growing needs for heating
and cooling assistance. The total number of recipient households
has declined from 7.1 million in 1981 to 3.9 million in 2000, as
states have had to restrict eligibility to the neediest of the needy.
Despite the additional $1 billion appropriated for FY 2006, only
15 percent of households that were eligible received LIHEAP assistance.
Source: LIHEAP Home Energy Notebook for FY 2001,
page 26, figure 3-20
The residential energy burden (including heating,
cooling and all other energy uses in the home) for all U.S. households
in 2001 was $1,537 per household, or 7.0 percent of income. For
LIHEAP recipient households, the respective figures are $1,301 and
17.2 percent, nearly two and one half times the average burden.
At this level, many poor and elderly, including households with
children, are forced to choose between heating their homes and purchasing
food and/or important medications.[3]
Increasingly, the energy markets at the wholesale level have been
deregulated and behave now like other commodity markets where price
volatility exists. But price volatility adversely affects the poor,
because they enter the market at the highest times of demand. Low-income
consumers generally do not have the disposable income to purchase
fuels off-season at lower costs. Thus, while energy prices have
remained fairly stable on an annualized basis, seasonal price spikes
have had terrible effects on the poor.
The Success of LIHEAP
LIHEAP has nurtured a very positive, effective partnership between
the federal government, state governments and the private sector.
By leveraging private dollars to supplement federal dollars, LIHEAP
has proven that successful relationships can exist between the government,
businesses, gas and electric utilities and community-based social
service organizations.
While states, local governments and the private sector have demonstrated
their capacity to develop programs to address some energy assistance
needs, collectively these programs cannot meet the demand for LIHEAP
assistance. The need for energy assistance continues.
Learn how you can help to support LIHEAP
Learn about LIHEAP's program components
Are you in need of heating and cooling assistance? Start
here.
Notes:
1. LIHEAP Home Energy Notebook for FY 2001, pg viii
2. LIHEAP Home Energy Notebook for FY 2001, page
26 figure 3-20
3. LIHEAP Home Energy Notebook for FY 2001, page
3
|